Editor’s Note: What promised to be a two-part series over the weekend has extended to a multi-part series for no other purpose than to generate readership at SBCOutpost.com. Enjoy.
The censure of Wade Burleson by his fellow trustees at the International Mission Board will most likely – in the end – do more to boost the Oklahoma preacher’s agenda for Southern Baptist reform than anything previously attempted by those who share his concerns and find affinity with his proposals. Of course, thus far, Burleson has done very little to advance a proposal for reform. His part has been a prophetic voice of dissent. His more enduring role must become the advocate for an agenda of reform.
He does well to remember, I think, that all reform movements begin with dissent, but they must move beyond the prophetic finger-pointing to the prospective vision casting if they are to have any lasting ecclesiastic effect. The Sermon on the Mount, for instance, is much more concerned with the ways that Christians will live and pray and speak than it is the hypocrisies and heresies of the Pharisees. The Pharisees get their black eyes, to be sure, but the Lord of Glory knew all to well that his apostles would never succeed in advancing the Kingdom if they went around indicting religious elites rather than healing the sick, lame, and oppressed.
Which is why I believe that the IMB’s censure of Burleson falls within that splendid category of events whose occurrence – while intended to suppress an idea and its author – demonstrate with certainty that the sovereign providences of God are often unveiled with incredible irony and humor. The sons of Jacob believed that an empty well and a traveling band of Midianites would rid them of their dreaming younger brother and his menacing effrontery, only to bow before him in Pharoah’s court several years afterward with hands outstretched for an eleemosynary dispensation of Egypt’s grain.
Indeed, what men intend for evil, God intends for good.
I want to follow my previous installment on this issue, and I hope to throw some red meat to the ravenous revolutionaries who salivate when I display full force my penchant for recriminating rhetorical flourish. So without further ado, I proceed.
First, the Burleson ordeal is becoming very old to Southern Baptists, who tire of pointless political posturing as often as they tire of puppet ministries and Christmas pageants. Just when we thought the issue was over, a handful of IMB trustees regurgitate their rancid and bitter spew for reasons almost imperceptible to the most astute denominational observer. Thus, the origins of this silly, sordid tale of Baptist bickering:
Two years ago this month, the IMB passed a pair of controversial policies to restrict from missionary appointment those candidates who had either (a) been baptized by ordinance administrators deemed unqualified to immerse or (b) prayed in an unknown tongue. Burleson, concerned that the new policies were aimed all too intentionally at IMB President Jerry Rankin and enacted by the loyalists of Rankin’s chief denominational antagonist, Paige Patterson, denounced the policies and launched his blog to take his case to Southern Baptists at large.
Within a few weeks, the trustees voted to eject Burleson from their number by requesting his removal by the convention’s messengers in annual session. Hundreds, and perhaps thousands, cried foul, and the trustees backed off. In the process, however, Burleson gained a greater profile in the Southern Baptist Convention, to the degree that his influence was almost universally credited with the election of SBC President Frank Page the following June. Burleson retained his trusteeship, but was denied any committee appointment and continued to publish his “offending” views and impressions on his increasingly popular blog.
All seemed quiet and settled for Lottie Moon season, until last month when California trustee Jerry Corbaley – the original author of the earlier Burleson ouster – sent his 153 page bill of particulars to all IMB trustees, calling on the board’s chairman, John Floyd, and the trustee executive committee to censure Burleson. I sat in Burleson’s office when he tried on three occasions to contact Corbaley and discuss the matter, and I sat across the table when he made the decision to publish his colleague’s letter. We both anticipated that the convention was headed toward another defining moment, and we waited patiently to see whether or not the trustee leadership would adopt Corbaley’s wild and imprudent scheme for personal retribution.
At 5:45 a.m. on Monday morning, November 5, I left my home in Enid, Oklahoma to pick up Wade Burleson in a rented Ford Mustang to drive the eight-hour trip to Springfield, IL. We arrived just in time for Wade to make a meeting with the trustee leadership at 3:30 p.m.
What happened next is a surreal series of events that have now – once again – thrown Southern Baptists into an entirely avoidable quagmire of tailspinning nonsense, and all because of the empty-headed and orchestrated chicanery of a few IMB trustees and at least one IMB administrator.
To be continued…
Recent Comments