Could Missouri Illustrate a Third Way?
Topic: Benjamin Cole, Contributors, Cooperation, Indianapolis 2008, Micah Fries, Politics, SBC News, Todd Littleton, Unity| 24 Comments »One of the central issues in the SBC revolves around the penchant for oppositional thinking. Simply put one is either for us or against us. This statement lifted from the words of Jesus seems to settle down on human relationships and relational configurations so that we find both sides claiming the will and way of God. For instance, what have in some quarters been referred to as “establishment bloggers” assume any call for accountability nothing but disrespect and an attempt to wrest power from those who have led in the CR/Takeover in/of the SBC.
For too long we have had “sides.” For Southern Baptists to refer to factions as sides seems a bit oxymoronic when we will all admit that where three or four Southern Baptists are gathered there are four or five opinions in their midst. Some analysts may view the recent MBC Annual Meeting as “repudiation,” and it may well be. However, what would it mean if it were a signal to those on both sides that lines in the SBC are surely subject to the tide. We talk of lines in the sand but if you have ever watched the tides come in and out, you know quickly lines change in the sand.
It is interesting one time contributor and “owner” of SBC Outpost, Michah Fries, chose the title for his MBC reflections as “Quake at the Lake.” Certainly he notes this is an “overheard” reference, but to select that for your blog reporting signals the presence of fault lines and sides. Micah reports on the goings on in a series of posts laced throughout with references to those of differing positions in the MBC. This is not criticism but reflection. There is little mistaking the tactics and patterns of Roger Moran are not favored by most here at SBC Outpost. We are glad for the shift in leadership away from such legalistic factions-creating personalities. It was interesting to note Micah offered clarifying words regarding statements made by Interim Exec. Tolliver, presumably in his “red meat” sermon.
While it would be interesting to hear a debate between Roger Moran and Darrin Patrick, I for one hope Darrin will decline. You see this would play to the oppositional thinking present in the SBC and we are not in need of further polarization but of a third way. Yes, a third way must include exposure of the egregious leadership errors chiefly illustrated by taking care of the “good old boys.” So, before you, dear reader, think this is a slap at the matters Ben Cole continues to raise on this blog, read again. No one is interested in re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic (read, SBC). Rather, in answer to an oft asked question about the “vision” of some at SBC Outpost, note this author considers it necessary to move beyond the structures and systems that continue to propagate the current climate. Do not attempt to obfuscate with concern for inerrancy or your favored view of the atonement.
We tire of guilt by association evidenced by Roger Moran’s diatribes against the likes of the Acts 29 Network. We are weary, though sympathetic, of the “what took you so long” by those who left the SBC long ago.
I will take the actions in the MBC as indication those interested in cooperation are waking from their slumber. Nothing could be more promising than to think in Indianapolis we may experience this same sentiment. Could we stand in the same way as the SOC and eschew angry men desirous of leadership in the SBC who want to continue to narrow the parameters of cooperation and fellowship? May it be so.
Recent Comments